Inclusion Without Literacy: Uncovering the Hidden Financial Risks Facing Indonesia’s Young Adults

Conducted in collaboration with Women’s World Banking, this study explores the financial behaviors and challenges of urban Indonesian young adults aged 18–25. It also examines existing university financial literacy programs to identify more effective interventions that can drive behavioral change.

The Impact

From the research, three phenomenon that influence young adults financial behaviors are identified:

  • Impulsive and consumptive buying: Social pressure and a “money is always available” mindset lead to impulsive spending, preventing young adults from building savings or emergency funds. For instance, we heard a story about the student organization leader who felt obligated to pay for everyone in a meeting held in a café.
  • Overestimating loan repayment capacity: The easily accessible online loans, non-transparent terms, and a poor understanding of risk causes young adults to overestimate their repayment capacity and fall into damaging debt cycles.
  • Hesitancy and instant-return mindset in investing: A combination of fearing investment fraud and desiring immediate gains makes young adults reluctant to engage with investment products.

Based on these findings, we facilitated workshops with key stakeholders to build collective awareness around the real-world financial challenges young people face. These sessions empower stakeholders to be active problem-solvers, reducing the gap between high-level strategies and on-the-ground implementation.

Our Approach

The research used a mixed-method approach, qualitative and quantitative methods, where we conducted primarily qualitative research followed by quantitative research conducted by the UniTrend – Institute for Policy Development team. The qualitative fieldwork was conducted in three cities Bandung, Surabaya, and Kendari to represent western, central, and eastern Indonesia. These cities were selected based on strong performance in financial inclusion and literacy indicators to help surface best practices. For the targeted young adults, we talked with diverse experiences in financial product use, challenges, and exposure to literacy programs to better understand their behaviors and pain points.

Focus group Discussion with students to understand current financial literacy needs and existing programs
Example of money management tool used by young adults

Our Journey and Process

Preliminary Research

We began by mapping stakeholders and understanding the current financial literacy landscape. This included desk research and initial in-depth interviews (IDIs) with young adults, university lecturers, and financial literacy influencers.

We also conducted preliminary workshops with stakeholders, such as the government agencies, universities, and Financial Service Providers (FSPs) to define the problem space and frame key hypotheses.

Qualitative Research

In the main fieldwork phase, we used two qualitative methods to gather rich contextual insights:

  • Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with University Students
    We conducted FGDs with two groups of students: those who organize and manage financial literacy programs on campus, and those who participate in them. This allowed us to compare perspectives from both sides, capturing how programs are designed, delivered, and received.
  • In-depth Interviews (IDIs)
    We spoke with a wide range of stakeholders, including financial institutions and service providers to explore program design, execution challenges, and unmet needs; university leadership and academics to understand how financial literacy is (or isn’t) embedded institutionally; and students from diverse genders, socioeconomic backgrounds, product usage, and living arrangements to gain deeper insight into their financial behaviors and challenges.

Synthesis & Co-creation

Insights from fieldwork revealed key behavioral patterns, unmet needs, and disconnects between existing financial literacy programs and youth realities.

The key findings are revealing gaps in the current program reach, format, content and outcome measurement.

  • From exclusive to inclusive: Expanding access across campus
    Current programs in universities are centered around Faculties of Economics and Business, creating big gaps for students from other academic backgrounds.
  • Format & content: From one-off seminars to continuous, learner-centered programs
    Continuous and practical knowledge in a program is rare as programs often push generic information or brand awareness.
  • Measuring behavioral outcomes: From participation counts to behavior change
    Often evaluated using the number of participants reached or accounts opened, current programs are missing indicators to capture young adults behavioral change and skills development.

These findings became the foundation for co-creation workshops involving government agencies, financial regulators, FIs/FSPs, university representatives, and industry associations. Together, we developed possible interventions to close the gaps.

Workshop with the relevant stakeholders

The Results

The research identified critical financial behaviors and mindsets among young adults, along with gaps in current literacy programs. These insights informed potential interventions that we identify and recommend for policymakers, universities, and financial institutions to better align their efforts with youth needs.



Consultant in-charge

dono-firman

Dono Firman

Project Oversee

anindya-fitriyanti

Anindya Fitriyanti

Project Lead

daniel-fandra

Daniel Fandra

Research Ops

chin-bw-2

Chin Chin Burkolter

Project Oversee

Bhagaskara Setiawan

User Researcher

See more our similar works

Collaborate with us!

Looking for ways to transforming your business?
Get in touch with us!